🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the crisis caused by the announcement of a new 28-article proposal for achieving ceasefire appeared – briefly – to have been stabilised. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its retaliation: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Negotiation and Warfare

The sequence of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are fought: positive announcements are issued from different nations. Significant resources is allocated on restraining particular approaches. By night, Moscow brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the main instrument for achieving "resolution".

After-Dark Attacks

As Russia's attack progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capacity afforded by current data. From vantage locations, military aircraft that had been deployed to engage hostile aerial threats streaked across the sky – sophisticated military planes supplied to Ukraine by European allies.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: defensive missiles targeted at a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably delivered by allied countries. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly becomes grim resignation: possibly the hostile projectile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from catastrophe and further power outages.

Ongoing Risks

Soon after, a automatic firearm opened up on a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – probably Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the shots failed to hit the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its objective.

Intermittently, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the morning news: seven people killed, destruction and utility failures in numerous residences as a result of the night's assault. As customarily, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a reliance that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the short term.

Failed Diplomacy

The 28-point plan from US administration provoked deep reactions, discussion and deep concern – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new approach from Washington adheres to the same pattern: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually win the battle. This pattern will, no doubt, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is easy to blame specific actors of consistently pushing Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. Washington operates on a premise familiar among experienced diplomats: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have been unable to protect through force. The American government believes that it is impossible to pressure the Kremlin to abandon the territory that it already controls in Ukraine's south or east.

The challenge is that while recognising this factual reality, Washington does nothing to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from assuming that the current condition will not shift further in its advantage in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is confident that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its partners are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to sign a deal that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's government remains highly assured in the result.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, slowly losing civilians and areas but averting a entire defensive failure until situations evolve in its favour.

Present Conditions

Objectively, there are no real preconditions for a ceasefire. Now, subjective factors are entering the equation: political desires to mediate resolution and secure international recognition, and Ukrainian leadership's twin challenges – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the flag against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their focus does not shift toward domestic problems. And although their task will now be significantly challenging after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a mere seven days to terminate the suggested clauses of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, latest revelations, all served their function.

While new plans based on old ideas are imminent, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect certain reluctance to alter the situation, if they maintain solidarity and strengthen their defence capabilities at a much faster pace. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on continued Western support.