🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.